Showing posts with label Beadwindow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Beadwindow. Show all posts

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Red Sky Weekly - New TTP detected by Beadwindow member!

This week will mark two milestones --our active user-adoption is at an all time high and Fusion Report 30 is about to be released. As with every social network, there are ebbs and flows, however this week the flow has hit a record rate. We hope the momentum will continue. Saturday will see the release of our 30th fusion report which will detail a previously unobserved TTP and C2 protocol. To date we have reported on over 10 different threat actors and have built out a solid profile of several of the more active groups.

If you haven’t been able to tell, I’m really excited! I haven’t been this excited about a major success in one of the portals since earlier this year. We’ve had a ton of ‘wins’ but this week one of our government members posted early indicators and pcap of a TTP shift in the Beadwindow portal. That information generated incredibly active discussions in the portal --crowdsourcing. Everyone brought a piece to the table until in the end, the new TTP was validated and shared.

So major activity this week:

  • Beadwindow was on fire with activity surrounding a TTP shift. The information was shared with the private portal, prompting several of them to jump into the conversation on Beadwindow
  • Red Sky received a submission from a non-member which lead to the discovery of more activity utilizing Windows Credential Editor to steal Windows creds (does anyone know when this will be fixed in Windows?)
  • A piece of malware that our folks have struggled with for the last couple of weeks finally broke and gave up the booty --a previously unknown (at least by us) TTP and C2 protocol

Interestingly enough, this stuff really demonstrated what I think is the value of Beadwindow. Our submitter is a state government guy who used our Norman MAG2 malware analysis tool, bounced findings and ideas off of our Red Sky Alliance technical lead and analyzed the targeted cyber events by interacting directly with the mature, APT-hardened information security teams in large private companies --and they’re helping him protect his networks --and he’s given them something to protect theirs. This is exactly how Beadwindow is supposed to work.

Before I forget, if you’ve not been mailed directly, we’re honoring our Founding Member prices through the end of this year. After that, they’re gone. While most will not be brought into the Advisory Board, the price holds through 12/31. We’re accepting full members and associate (vendor) members at 2012 prices. Don’t wait.

Until next week. Hopefully I’ll see some of you at FedCyber!
Jeff

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Red Sky Weekly - From the users perspective...

From the users perspective...

This week we released Fusion Report 27. FR12-027 contains analysis on the Citadel Banking trojan to include details on how the malware encrypts communications and behaves differently in a virtual environment. While this activity was not targeted in nature, the malware appeared to be widespread and affected users in both of our Red Sky and Beadwindow communities. This prompted me to thinking.. what does a typical user think about simple intrusions like this one?

To that, I took I the opportunity this week to have great conversations with users whose machines had been victimized during various events. I wanted to bring this back to
a “human” perspective and write this week’s blog and talk a bit about how users react when their computer starts to act funny. These are great observations. Infosec folks should pay attention. This is important. Here are a couple of observations and thoughts:

Users are becoming numb



This user, deep in work, checked his email, never suspecting that simply previewing email might launch a host-side attack, allowing the attacker access. The problem started with the bluetooth being turned on on his computer without his taking any action. The user simply closed the laptop assuming the operating system was acting up. Small issues, when noted on computers running multiple applications don’t mean much. One issue, when seemingly cleared up on reboot is far less trouble than contacting the helpdesk.

Agents on enterprise computers do funny things

When your computer slows down for no apparent reason, a typical user chalks it up to bad bandwidth, or all of the agents running on a computer. Antivirus slows performance, as do other agents running. Many applications fire up the webcam momentarily to gain situational awareness for later use, and contact lists are routinely updated, exported and interact with social networking sites --all creating small ‘glitches’ that are normal, but make real ‘gotchas’ seem normal too. Users can’t tell the difference.

Spearfishing and waterhole tactics are invisibile

Does the human have the advantage when identifying spearphished emails before they infect their computer? I’d argue not. What about waterhole attacks where frequently visited websites are poisoned in hopes users would stop by and become infected without knowing? Absolutely users are at a disadvantage. Users must take responsibility for their actions, but many, many of these attacks are designed to get past the user or infect their computer when they visit their favorite web page.

It’s easier to reboot or work through it

What’s more important, worrying about the obscure chance that someone is in your computer, or meeting the deadline? We work all hours day and night, and the inconvenience of something happening (for reasons known or unknown), simply mean a little extra work or inconvenience. The dedicated user works through it, waiting to see if it worsens. If so, they might contact the helpdesk or Infosec, but heck, we’ve got an Infosec team and they’re watching anyway, so if there’s really something wrong, Infosec will call.. right?

Bottom line: Users are learning to live with risk. Agents running on machines, the constant threat of bad email, and simple enterprise issues that arise daily are all causing users to work through the pain.

Users don’t know how to prioritize those risks that might really be stealing information,
or how to recognize the symptoms. How do we reach them? I’m interested in your feedback and thoughts.

Thoughts?
Jeff

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Red Sky Weekly - Research Libraries... Rich targets?

Imagine this: You go to the research library after receiving an assignment to prepare a brief for 9:00 Tuesday morning. You’ve been tasked with preparing thoughts regarding the acquisition of a new company and its technology, and you’re waist deep in due diligence by 2:00 Saturday morning --with no end in sight until that Tuesday morning presentation. You'll be pulling all-nighters through the weekend. You’ve got financials spread out all over the table, legal documents describing issues associated with purchasing companies in this part of the world, reference material and patent searches to confirm value of the intellectual property and you’re exchanging email with researchers elsewhere, as you and your virtual team pull together the deck and details you’ll be presenting in just a few days.

Now imagine this... those library computers, electronic searches, public internet access, probably wireless access that you connect to with your personal laptop, store all of those communications and queries somewhere -if not only in simple memory or cache. Every time you enter a query, search for a reference, send an email, receive an email or prepare work product on that library network or one of their public computers, you give a would-be competitive adversary a clear view into your specific research, sources, intellectual property review, etc. If that library hasn’t done the necessary work to ensure the privacy of their visitors, and don’t have ways of maintaining security, you might be giving away more research th
an you're getting. I would argue that librarians are not security people, and probably don’t know the value of the electronic treasure trove that exists in these otherwise quiet, relatively uneventful places of business.

Why might I think this? Last week I told the story of a billion dollar defense company that maxed out their cyber insurance policy and now gets harvested monthly for updated technologies or those missed during earlier visits. That blog post, within one week, became my most read page since
the blog's inception. Interestingly enough however, this isn’t the first time I’d heard this story. I heard exactly the same story three or four months ago in a conversation with a consultant that I’ve known for several years. The consultant lead a team of security people who did work in a large research library for about a year. He described the routine harvesting of electronic library queries, emails in/out of the library, etc., as “APT Day”. Apparently once every week, on the same day, the library is harvested for all of the previous weeks queries, emails to researchers, and work product residing on its own, and its public-use computers. Who would have thought!?  A LIBRARY!? Attackers, in one fell swoop, learn what is being researched, what forward thinking is happening here, and all of the sources used by the researchers!
We’re all at risk. If data, data about data, or communications about data exist, and someone wants it, there’s a pretty good chance they’re going to get it. Today, malware isn’t necessarily required. There are companies out there who sell VPN services using legitimate (but stolen) credentials. Bad guys are in your network using your remote access user name and password. The only way to know about them and defend your networks, computers and intellectual property is to talk with someone else who’s gone through the pain of defending against it already. You mustn't be shy. Attackers work in well orchestrated teams, choose their targets, operate with precision, and get what they want. They only have to find one way in. You have to defend every way in. This is Sun Tzu upside down, so forget that lesson of 'best to have a defensive position' and start asking questions of others -before it's too late.


BREAK BREAK

Red Sky had another terrific week. Here goes:

  • Fusion Report 25 released: FR12-025 discusses the PlugX malware leveraged in the recent IE 0 day attacks. The report included an in-depth analysis on the malware's functionality and capabilities. We also identified likely targets for the 0 day activity and provided information on related infrastructure that has a high-likelihood of being leveraged in the near future. The queuing for the analysis came from a private company member who wishes to participate to both portals. As a result, the report was published to both the Red Sky private portal, and the Beadwindow private/public portal where our current state/local members can also access it.

  • Beadwindow “Hoot ‘n Holler” call: We held our first Hoot ‘n Holler conference call with our Beadwindow members. The call included members from the Red Sky team, one state government and the CSO from a major metropolitan city. During the call, we assisted the government users with understanding the new TTPs from this week's Fusion Report, explained what they actually meant, and talked about how to protect from them.

  • New Members: This week we signed one new member and a second was invoiced and is now in legal review. The first is a high tech/defense company, with about a billion dollars in annual revenue. The company has already started contributing to the portal and will be attending our Threat Day next week. The second is going through legal review as we speak, and when they come into the portal, they’ll bring the management lessons and visibility of their three million computer environment. The company is diversified with majority holdings in global retail, technology, real estate and energy. We’re very happy to have both companies join us in the Alliance!

So for the last several months I’ve been keeping you up to speed on the progress, growth, and significant happenings in Red Sky Alliance. The other day I was asked during lunch to quantify our membership, our business, and where we are in relation to others entering the information sharing space. I’ve done this informally before
and here’s what I tell people:

We began bringing members into our empty portal in mid-February. Since then the participation has been terrific.  While the numbers are an estimate based on an informal survey of the members, we believe they’re pretty close, and very telling of the community we’re growing:

  • As of today Red Sky Alliance hosts 15 large enterprise, and four associate (analytic) members. Our current membership includes major telecom, several global banks, several high tech internet companies, one global engineering/construction company, and a couple of large enterprise diversified companies engaged in everything from airplane manufacturing to electronics to energy production.
  • We have five companies currently in various stages of the membership process. When these companies complete the process, we estimate that these 20 member companies will control close to 20 million devices in over 140 countries in the world in dozens of industry segments, including a global energy production, retail, real estate, and managed IT and security services. (Yes, we like MSPs. They help us scale protection while at the same time maintain opsec.)
  • Financial members in Red Sky process the vast majority of credit card transactions in the world today, and manage the lion's share of money moved between stock exchanges and their clearing houses.

On the Beadwindow side, in less than a month, we’ve added a couple of new members, and now include:

  • Three major US cities
  • One state government
  • One global bank
  • One  ISAC
  • One global Internet company

So, Red Sky is cooking with gas. The portal activity is picking up again post-summer, and solid activity is coming out of it. Fall is always busy until around Christmas. We’re geared up to handle it.

The Beadwindow portal is also doing well. New members mean new education. State and local governments (my first impression.. I’m learning too) seem to have very small information security budgets and little organization around managing across agencies. One CSO told us that his (one) IT Security guy was just moved out from under IT, and that neither the IT folks or the city government departments will let him look at data to perform his analysis. Whew. That must be exhausting, and a real morale dumper for the guy who’s going to be held responsible when something really does hit the fan (and it will!). There’s a major learning curve coming for these poor guys! We’re on it. We’ll do our best to help.

That’s it for now. Have a great weekend!
Jeff